Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
> I've noticed that if I try to use generate_series to include the upper
> boundary of int4, it never returns:

I'll bet it's testing "currval > bound" without considering the
possibility that incrementing currval caused an overflow wraparound.
We fixed a similar problem years ago in plpgsql FOR-loops...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries at 2011-02-01 00:15:06 from Thom Brown

Responses

• Re: Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries at 2011-02-01 02:17:17 from Thom Brown

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2011-02-01 01:25:59
	Subject: Re: pg_upgrade fails for non-postgres user
Previous:	From: Thom Brown	Date: 2011-02-01 00:48:13
	Subject: Re: Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Thom Brown	Date: 2011-02-01 02:17:17
	Subject: Re: Issues with generate_series using integer boundaries
Previous:	From: Aleksey Tsalolikhin	Date: 2011-02-01 00:54:38
	Subject: Why does my DB size differ between Production and DR? (Postgres 8.4)