Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On tis, 2012-07-03 at 19:35 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I wonder if we just should add a format code like %R or something similar as a 
>> replacement for the %X/%X notion.

> Maybe just print it as a single 64-bit value from now on.

That'd be problematic also, because of the lack of standardization of
the format code for uint64.  We could write things like
	"message... " UINT64_FORMAT " ...more message"
but I wonder how well the translation tools would work with that;
and anyway it would at least double the translation effort for
messages containing such things.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: Support for XLogRecPtr in expand_fmt_string? at 2012-07-03 18:45:51 from Peter Eisentraut

Responses

• Re: Support for XLogRecPtr in expand_fmt_string? at 2012-07-06 22:03:19 from Peter Eisentraut

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Andres Freund	Date: 2012-07-03 18:59:00
	Subject: Re: Support for XLogRecPtr in expand_fmt_string?
Previous:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2012-07-03 18:45:51
	Subject: Re: Support for XLogRecPtr in expand_fmt_string?