Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: syatskevich(at)n21lab(dot)gosniias(dot)msk(dot)ru,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)
Date: 2003-05-27 02:50:27
Message-ID: 12035.1054003827@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I reviewed all the user-settable GUC variables and generated the
> following patch --- there were quite a few other setting that should be
> super-user only.

Where in the world did you get the idea that debug settings should be
SUSET?  The log_xxx settings probably should be, but I don't agree with
the rest of these changes ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-05-27 02:53:34
Subject: Re: array functions - request for opinions (was Re: [PATCHES] array
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2003-05-27 02:47:15
Subject: Re: array functions - request for opinions (was Re: [PATCHES]

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-05-27 03:58:27
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-05-27 02:31:36
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2003-05-27 03:50:44
Subject: Sequence usage patch
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-05-27 02:31:36
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group