Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: syatskevich(at)n21lab(dot)gosniias(dot)msk(dot)ru, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)
Date: 2003-05-27 02:50:27
Message-ID: 12035.1054003827@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I reviewed all the user-settable GUC variables and generated the
> following patch --- there were quite a few other setting that should be
> super-user only.

Where in the world did you get the idea that debug settings should be
SUSET? The log_xxx settings probably should be, but I don't agree with
the rest of these changes ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-27 03:58:27 Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-27 02:31:36 Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-05-27 02:53:34 Re: array functions - request for opinions (was Re: [PATCHES] array
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-05-27 02:47:15 Re: array functions - request for opinions (was Re: [PATCHES]

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-05-27 03:50:44 Sequence usage patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-27 02:31:36 Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS)