| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Clark, Andrew" <Andrew(dot)Clark(at)fnf(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Solaris SPARC - Sun compiler 5.5 - 64 bit |
| Date: | 2005-07-29 16:17:45 |
| Message-ID: | 1202.1122653865@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-ports |
I wrote:
> "Clark, Andrew" <Andrew(dot)Clark(at)fnf(dot)com> writes:
>> Well that definitely did something, but now I get a different error:
> OK, thanks for the confirmation. There was some discussion recently
> of whether we shouldn't add -DSUNOS4_CC to the solaris template,
> but we didn't have proof.
Actually, this doesn't prove anything one way or the other. Because you
were manually specifying CFLAGS, and thereby overriding the template,
the lack of -DSUNOS4_CC in the manual CFLAGS caused the s_lock.c
failure.
So: which template did configure pick on your machine, anyway?
(This is reported in the first few lines of configure output)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Clark, Andrew | 2005-07-29 16:42:03 | Re: Solaris SPARC - Sun compiler 5.5 - 64 bit |
| Previous Message | Clark, Andrew | 2005-07-29 15:45:15 | Re: Solaris SPARC - Sun compiler 5.5 - 64 bit |