Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Date: 2008-01-31 14:33:53
Message-ID: 1201790033.4453.291.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 11:20 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > > in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard error,
> > > rather than something people could override with -i.
>
> +1 to this idea. TODO for 8.4?

-1 without some more planning about the effects and implications.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-31 14:45:07 Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-31 14:20:54 Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-31 14:47:26 Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-31 14:20:54 Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable