Re: [GENERAL] Backup

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>
Cc: Phillip Smith <phillip(dot)smith(at)weatherbeeta(dot)com(dot)au>, "'Dominic Carlucci'" <carlucci(at)cae(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, carlucci(at)cae(dot)ca
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Backup
Date: 2008-01-31 13:28:48
Message-ID: 1201786128.4453.287.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general

On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 07:21 -0500, Chander Ganesan wrote:
> If you don't mind if you lose some transactions

That sentence has no place in any discussion about "backup" because the
risk is not just a few transactions, it is a corrupt and inconsistent
database from which both old and new data would be inaccessible.

As far as I am concerned, if any Postgres user loses data then we're all
responsible.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2008-01-31 14:34:05 Re: [GENERAL] Backup
Previous Message Chander Ganesan 2008-01-31 12:21:37 Re: [GENERAL] Backup

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Enrico Sirola 2008-01-31 13:49:44 Re: Oracle Analytical Functions
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-01-31 13:27:27 Re: PostgreSQL on a CompactFlash