Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Truncate Triggers

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>
Cc: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Truncate Triggers
Date: 2008-01-31 11:45:55
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:22 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> > CLUSTER isn't DDL. Most forms of ALTER TABLE are. And CREATE blah, etc.
> Fwiw I would call CLUSTER DDL. Note that it does make a change that's visible
> in the table definition afterwards.
> There are plenty of DDL commands which modify data (CREATE INDEX, ATLER TABLE
> ALTER COLUMN TYPE). The defining characteristic of DDL is not that it doesn't
> modify the data but that it does modify the table definition.
> By that definition CLUSTER is DDL and TRUNCATE is DDL if you look at the
> implementation rather than the user-visible effects.

Surely the question is more simple: do we want triggers on it?

There's a clear case for TRUNCATE to have a triggers.

Is there a clear case for any other statements (however you categorise
them)? If so, lets hear it, please.

  Simon Riggs

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-01-31 12:31:45
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target
Previous:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2008-01-31 10:40:54
Subject: Re: Truncate Triggers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group