Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?

From: Ow Mun Heng <Ow(dot)Mun(dot)Heng(at)wdc(dot)com>
To: Jason Topaz <topaz(at)panix(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?
Date: 2008-01-31 02:11:19
Message-ID: 1201745479.679.23.camel@neuromancer.home.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 20:47 +0900, Jason Topaz wrote:

> I don't disagree with your point that it's not robust with examples of
> "exactly how a particular problem can be solved".  But I think there are
> enough, and more importantly, I don't think problem-solving is an
> important focus for a manual (that's why 3rd party books exist). 

Which is also the cause of the original rant. There is very few 3rd
party books.

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Josh TrutwinDate: 2008-01-31 02:14:15
Subject: Re: MySQL [WAS: postgresql book...]
Previous:From: Matthew T. O'ConnorDate: 2008-01-31 01:56:39
Subject: Re: enabling autovacuum

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group