Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

AW: Open 7.1 items

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Jan Wieck'" <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <root(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: AW: Open 7.1 items
Date: 2001-01-26 17:52:33
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633681E3@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > FOREIGN KEY INSERT & UPDATE/DELETE in transaction "change violation"
> 
>     A well known issue, and I've asked multiple times how exactly
>     we want to define the behaviour for deferred constraints.  Do
>     foreign keys reference just to a key value and are happy with
>     it's existance, or do they refer to a particular row?

Sorry, to answer late. I didn't know this needed clarification.
The answer is simple, foreign keys only reference a key value,
not a particular row.

Andreas

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Mikheev, VadimDate: 2001-01-26 18:02:59
Subject: RE: Open 7.1 items
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-01-26 17:47:42
Subject: Re: Hardwired MAXBACKENDS limit could be history

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group