Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

AW: GEQO status?

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: AW: GEQO status?
Date: 2000-12-27 08:57:39
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368198@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > You can remove the randomness by setting the Seed 
> configuration value,
> 
> True, but that's not the default setup.

I would set Seed per default. Even worse than a bad query path
is an unpredictable query path. I see no argument, that a random Seed
would buy us anything.

Andreas

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Brent VernerDate: 2000-12-27 09:06:11
Subject: Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-12-27 05:56:26
Subject: PHP and PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group