Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

AW: AW: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Thomas Lockhart'" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: AW: AW: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...
Date: 2000-12-21 15:18:31
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368194@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > IIRC oid uses int4in/int4out and those should definitely be able to parse
> > -1040 into a 4 byte signed long without platform dependency, no ?
> 
> Tom Lane changed this recently to have OID use its own i/o routines.

Reading the code, I don't understand it. Why would strtoul return an int in the 
first place ? The name seems to imply an unsigned long return type. 
Seems config should check the return type of strtoul.

Andreas

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-21 15:24:44
Subject: Re: AW: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2000-12-21 14:54:10
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group