AW: AW: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Thomas Lockhart'" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: AW: AW: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...
Date: 2000-12-21 15:18:31
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368194@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > IIRC oid uses int4in/int4out and those should definitely be able to parse
> > -1040 into a 4 byte signed long without platform dependency, no ?
>
> Tom Lane changed this recently to have OID use its own i/o routines.

Reading the code, I don't understand it. Why would strtoul return an int in the
first place ? The name seems to imply an unsigned long return type.
Seems config should check the return type of strtoul.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-21 15:24:44 Re: AW: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-12-21 14:54:10 Re: AW: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...