Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

AW: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: AW: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources
Date: 2000-10-31 07:51:59
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633680D8@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > Hmm. I wonder why cc and gcc are doing different math.  Wierd. 
> 
> Not only that, but you get different results with the same compiler
> depending on different optimization settings.  The joys of 
> binary floating point...

Same on AIX.

Andreas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-10-31 09:46:39
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Previous:From: Luis MagaaDate: 2000-10-31 06:32:37
Subject: Data definition for aclitem Datatype

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group