AW: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in u se

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Philip Warner'" <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: AW: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in u se
Date: 2000-10-25 07:36:05
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633680D0@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I have not followed the entire thread, but if you are in a serializable OR
> repeatable-read transaction,

Serializable and repeatable read are the same thing, different wording.

> I would think that read-only statements will
> need to keep some kind of lock on the rows they read (or the table).

Yes, we were talking about the other isolation levels. Most,
but not all of my mails in this thread state this difference.

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message devik 2000-10-25 08:12:55 Re: Two-phase commit
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2000-10-25 07:29:33 Re: Re: how to access backend pid from libpq ?