Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps
Date: 2008-01-09 15:04:34
Message-ID: 1199891074.4266.292.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 16:42 +0100, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:

> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 22:26 +0100, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> >
> >> I'm still puzzled about how a DBA is expected to figure out which
> >> segments to mark. Simon, are you assuming we are going to pass on
> >> segment numbers to the DBA one day?
> >
> > No Way!
>
> Ah, I'm glad ;-)

But now you want names on partitions?

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-01-09 15:07:23 Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-01-09 14:57:19 Re: Some notes about the index-functions security vulnerability