Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: revision of todo: NULL for ROW variables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: revision of todo: NULL for ROW variables
Date: 2010-10-28 14:15:24
Message-ID: 11969.1288275324@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am checking PLpgSQL ToDo topics, and I am not sure if this topic
> isn't done. And if not, then I would to get some detail.

I think that thread petered out because we didn't have consensus on
what the behavior ought to be.  It goes back to whether there is
supposed to be a difference between NULL and ROW(NULL,NULL,NULL,...)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-10-28 14:23:05
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-10-28 13:49:06
Subject: Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group