On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 09:49 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > If people understand there aren't 13 performance improvements there are
> > at *least* 19+ that is a positive message to help people decide to
> > upgrade.
> Frankly I think the release notes are already too long.
So why do we have stuff in there that the users will never see?
We already have a release summary, so why summarise *some* of the detail
as well, but not all of it???
I see no reason to diminish yours, Heikki's or my own contributions, all
of which were in the area of performance, which people do care about.
None of the ones I mentioned were trivial patches, nor were their
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2007-11-30 11:17:05|
|Subject: Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL|
|Previous:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 2007-11-30 10:15:35|
|Subject: Re: PostGreSQL and recursive queries...|