Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.4 Checkpoint Question

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.4 Checkpoint Question
Date: 2007-11-29 16:14:21
Message-ID: 1196352861.4246.1302.camel@ebony.site (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 10:10 -0500, Brad Nicholson wrote:
> I have a legacy system still on 7.4 (I know, I know...the upgrade is
> coming soon).
> 
> I have a fairly big spike happening once a day, every day, at the same
> time.  It happens during a checkpoint, no surprise there.  I know the
> solution to the problem (upgrade to a modern version), but what I'm
> looking for as an explanation as to why one particular checkpoint would
> be so bad on a low volume system, so I can appease certain management
> concerns. 
> 
> This is a _really _low volume system, less than 500 writes/hour.  Normal
> operation sees checkpoint related spikes of around 200-300 milliseconds.
> We always checkpoint at the checkpoint timeout (every 5 minutes).
> During this one checkpoint, I'm seeing transactions running 2-3 seconds.
> During this time, writes are < 5/minute.
> 
> Relevant settings:
> shared_buffers = 10000
> 
> checkpoint_segments = 30
> checkpoint_timeout = 300
> 
> What gives?

If the timing is regular, its most likely a human-initiated action
rather then a behavioural characteristic.

VACUUM runs in background at that time, updates loads of blocks which
need to be written out at checkpoint time. That slows queries down at
that time but not others.

-- 
  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-11-29 16:14:26
Subject: Re: TB-sized databases
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2007-11-29 16:02:19
Subject: Re: 7.4 Checkpoint Question

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group