Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Luke Lonergan <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Anton <anton200(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1
Date: 2007-10-27 21:31:22
Message-ID: 1193520682.4242.607.camel@ebony.site (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 15:12 -0400, Luke Lonergan wrote:
> And I repeat - 'we fixed that and submitted a patch' - you can find it
> in the unapplied patches queue.

I got the impression it was a suggestion rather than a tested patch,
forgive me if that was wrong.

Did the patch work? Do you have timings/different plan?

-- 
  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Luke LonerganDate: 2007-10-27 21:48:16
Subject: Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-10-27 21:26:49
Subject: Re: Speed difference between select ... union select ...and select from partitioned_table

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group