Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Roberts, Jon" <Jon(dot)Roberts(at)asurion(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails
Date: 2007-10-15 20:19:04
Message-ID: 1192479544.5272.13.camel@ebony.site (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 10:42 -0500, Roberts, Jon wrote:

> Like I said in the email, I think the best solution is to put the code in a
> function.  However, after I inserted a total of 25 jobs, the difference is
> more noticeable and my sql is better in terms of cost and total time.

You're missing a few key points:

- this isn't the PgAdmin hackers list, so you're asking in the wrong
place ... go to www.pgadmin.org and go from there. This is the standard
PostgreSQL bug list and you haven't shown any bug with standard
PostgreSQL.

- PgAdmin 1.8 is almost released so you may have missed the boat 

- pgAdmin is trying to work with other PG variants, so a reasoned
argument, in the right place, may help.

I'll leave it to you to re-post appropriate parts of this thread.

-- 
  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-10-15 20:24:06
Subject: Re: BUG #3674: Unnecessary checkpoints by WAL Writer
Previous:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2007-10-15 16:27:04
Subject: Re: IPv6 Support in 8.0.3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group