Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL featurecomparison - Part 2

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Derek Rodner <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL featurecomparison - Part 2
Date: 2007-10-12 18:19:02
Message-ID: 1192213142.19081.71.camel@dogma.ljc.laika.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 15:26 -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 10/11/07, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> > I would like postgres to have a really good auditing system. For me,
> > it's one of the most important features that postgresql doesn't already
> > have.
> 
> Agreed.
> 

My ideas on the subject are fairly vague.

Do you have a link to a well-thought-out design for database auditing,
that PostgreSQL could use as a model for implementation? The list
archives are fairly sparse on the subject.

I might have time to do some work on this.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2007-10-15 02:28:41
Subject: Re: Interesting pro-postgres article on reddit
Previous:From: Ron MayerDate: 2007-10-12 17:37:33
Subject: Re: Release notes introductory text

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group