On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 15:50 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >  Somebody who wants the
> > above behavior can send "ROLLBACK; DISCARD ALL".
> 
> ...which generates an ERROR if no transaction is in progress and fills
> the log needlessly.

Well, it's a WARNING, but your point is taken. Can't a clueful interface
just check what the transaction status of the connection is, rather than
unconditionally issuing a ROLLBACK?

-Neil

In response to

• Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL at 2007-10-04 14:50:16 from Simon Riggs

Responses

• Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL at 2007-10-04 20:14:51 from Simon Riggs

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2007-10-04 20:14:51
	Subject: Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL
Previous:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2007-10-04 19:33:35
	Subject: Re: type money causes unrestorable dump

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2007-10-04 20:14:51
	Subject: Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-10-04 19:26:53
	Subject: Re: initdb of regression test failed.