On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 10:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 14:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Hmm, not right there, because we don't know that the file actually
> >> exists yet. Applied with modifications ...
> > Double hmmm, that means when we are waiting for file X in pg_standby the
> > ps display will still show "recovering X-1". I'd prefer to set ps before
> > the call to RestoreArchivedFile(), since that is where the wait occurs.
> > I got that wrong myself.
> Well, if you think that's an important time component --- which it could
> be in archive situations, I guess --- there should be a separate PS
> display state for it.
Agreed. I think it will save time answering questions on -admin later.
> Perhaps "fetching XXX" vs "restoring XXX"?
Restoring is the right term, I think.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2007-09-30 14:52:38|
|Subject: Re: set_ps_display during recovery|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-09-30 14:28:27|
|Subject: Re: set_ps_display during recovery |