Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Using Postgres as an alias

From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using Postgres as an alias
Date: 2007-09-26 12:23:41
Message-ID: 1190809421.3017.12.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 06:11 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> In an attempt to get "Postgres" more widely used, I propose changing
> "PostgreSQL" to "Postgres" in the documentation when there is more
> than one mention of "PostgreSQL" in the same paragraph.  The same
> could be done with the FAQ.
> Objections? 

I still cannot understand why we spend our energy on such a thing.

I strongly object. I don't want to see Postgres in any of our

As the lead RPM packager, I will *never* ever rename PostgreSQL to
Postgres in any of my packages, documentation, etc. unless we change our
official name someday (which I hope it won't happen any time)

From my point of view, I cannot spend time to rename the packages from
postgresql to postgres (I cannot think about the upgrade problems...)

PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng -

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Devrim GÜNDÜZDate: 2007-09-26 12:24:40
Subject: Re: Using Postgres as an alias
Previous:From: Gabriele BartoliniDate: 2007-09-26 12:16:06
Subject: Re: Using Postgres as an alias

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group