Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

v9 beta 2 - Build on Solaris SPARC - links to two different libxml2 implementations?

From: Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: pgsql-testers <pgsql-testers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: v9 beta 2 - Build on Solaris SPARC - links to two different libxml2 implementations?
Date: 2010-06-08 11:58:37
Message-ID: 1189685051.3112741275998317894.JavaMail.root@sz0093a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-testers

[TEST REPORT] 

[Release]: 9.0beta2 - via source 

[Test Type]: Configure and Install 

[Test]: Build of PostgreSQL on Solaris; as usual, it's a nice, smooth, easy process. Thanks, Team! 

We tend to build with custom packages, sometimes custom-built themselves, so experiment with the various environment variables to see if they get us where we want to be: 



export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -R/usr/local/ssl/lib" 

export LIBS=" -lssl -lcrypto -lsasl2 -lz -lm" 

export CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/ssl/include" 

export PYTHON="/usr/local/bin/python3" 

[Platform]: Solaris quad Enterprise 450 

[Parameters]: We do have libxml2 installed, under the /usr/local 'tree' and, for the moment, have made no effort to remove any SUN-provided xml2 package. 

[Failure]: NO 

[Results]: 

Configure/Build proceeds smoothly, without error. 

But linking appears to be looking for two different versions of libxml...?? 




Checking results of linking produces the following - ambiguous? - output: 



# ldd src/backend/postgres 

... 

libxml2.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2 

... 

libxml2.so.2 (SUNW_1.6) => (version not found) 



[Comments]: Haven't yet assessed what the impact of this might be at runtime; wanted to run it by the experts first. 

Responses

pgsql-testers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-06-08 17:45:25
Subject: Re: v9 beta 2 - Build on Solaris SPARC - links to two different libxml2 implementations?
Previous:From: Glen BarberDate: 2010-06-07 18:48:05
Subject: Re: Misplaced pg_upgrade_support.so ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group