From: | Mark Lewis <mark(dot)lewis(at)mir3(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Evan Carroll <lists(at)evancarroll(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: 8.2 Query 10 times slower than 8.1 (view-heavy) |
Date: | 2007-09-01 00:09:17 |
Message-ID: | 1188605357.5367.14.camel@archimedes |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 19:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Mark Lewis <mark(dot)lewis(at)mir3(dot)com> writes:
> >> We've been holding back from upgrading to 8.2 because this one is a
> >> show-stopper for us.
>
> > Well, you could always make your own version with this patch reverted:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-11/msg00066.php
> > I might end up doing that in the 8.2 branch if a better solution
> > seems too large to back-patch.
>
> I thought of a suitably small hack that should cover at least the main
> problem without going so far as to revert that patch entirely. What we
> can do is have the IS NULL estimator recognize when the clause is being
> applied at an outer join, and not believe the table statistics in that
> case. I've applied the attached patch for this --- are you interested
> in trying it out on your queries before 8.2.5 comes out?
Wish I could, but I'm afraid that I'm not going to be in a position to
try out the patch on the application that exhibits the problem for at
least the next few weeks.
-- Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brennan, Sean (IMS) | 2007-09-01 03:02:25 | schemas to limit data access |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-31 23:43:54 | Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ? |