Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Ron Peterson <ron(dot)peterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-08-28 16:34:26
Message-ID: 1188318866.15185.10.camel@goldbach
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, 2007-28-08 at 11:15 -0400, Robert Bernier wrote:
> How many people feel we should adopt 'postgres' for the '9.0'
> reference documentation (let's leave the issue of the tons of work
> involved out of the debate for the moment)?

+1 -- I think we should make the name change, but I don't have any
strong preference about when we ought to do it (now, for 8.3, for 8.4,
etc -- I wouldn't necessarily want to wait for some far-off theoretical
9.0 release).

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-08-28 16:43:33 Re: mysql proxy
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2007-08-28 16:27:11 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)