Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
Date: 2005-12-01 16:54:41
Message-ID: 11870.1133456081@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> Check integer conversion for overflow in datetime functions.

Looks reasonable, will check and apply.

> This patch should apply cleanly against HEAD and 8.1. If the patch
> looks good then I'll submit patches for earlier branches when I get
> a chance to build and test those versions.

Don't worry about that, I'll take care of it. I prefer committing all
the branches at once when doing a multi-branch fix (less clutter in
the CVS logs).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-12-01 17:12:11 Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-01 16:05:12 Re: Allow an alias for the target table in UPDATE/DELETE