| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)myyearbook(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Machine available for community use |
| Date: | 2007-07-30 19:23:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1185823403.3050.154.camel@laptop.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 20:22 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I'm checking into this, but it may take a few days to get an answer
> > (particularly since I'm planning to take Friday through Monday off).
>
> Well if we go RHEL why not CentOS5 and just call it good?
...because RHEL and CentOS are not really that identical. They are just
binary-compilant.
RHEL has better performance than CentOS -- I guess it is the compiler
options that Red Hat is using while compiling their RPMs.
I have performed a test using OSDL test suite a few months ago on a
system that has:
* 8 x86_64 CPUs @ 3200.263
* 16 Gigabytes of RAM
* PostgreSQL 8.1.5 (PGDG packages)
and RHEL performed much better than CentOS.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-07-30 20:47:58 | Re: Quick idea for reducing VACUUM contention |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-07-30 19:20:48 | Reducing Transaction Start/End Contention |