Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Attempt to re-archive existing WAL logs afterrestoringfrom backup

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Jon Colverson" <pgsql(at)vcxz(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Attempt to re-archive existing WAL logs afterrestoringfrom backup
Date: 2007-06-01 20:02:19
Message-ID: 1180728140.26297.261.camel@silverbirch.site (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 12:02 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 16:09 +0100, Jon Colverson wrote:
> > > 
> > >> This looks like a bug to me. Any thoughts?
> > > 
> 
> > No; nothing is touching the archive except for the archive_command being 
> > run by PostgreSQL.
> 
> Jon,
> 
> You're still troubled by what you've seen?
> 
> Can you start from the beginning again and describe exactly what set of
> circumstances you're in. I want to remove any bug or doubt that there is
> one lurking.

I've spent some time re-examining the code and I can't see a route for
the discussed problem to occur. All the main code paths do not exhibit
this problem in 8.2, so I'm not sure where to go from here.

If you can help further, please give me a shout.

-- 
  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-06-01 20:05:47
Subject: Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-06-01 19:54:54
Subject: Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updatinganupdatable view)

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-06-01 20:07:46
Subject: Re: Deletes hurt
Previous:From: Dan HarrisDate: 2007-06-01 18:51:54
Subject: Re: Function to offset current timestamp

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group