| From: | Adam Tauno Williams <adamtaunowilliams(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL. |
| Date: | 2007-05-30 22:12:02 |
| Message-ID: | 1180563122.4265.2.camel@aleph.whitemice.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 17:18 -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:42:08PM -0300, Fernando Ike de Oliveira wrote:
> > was 99,7% but considering the current necessities, change percentual
> > to 99,99%. I think in solution probability pgpool-2 or Heartbeat +
> > GFS. The PostgreSQL servers will be in different physical places.
> I would be very interested to see a set-up that can actually
> guarantee 99.99% uptime across a wide area link.
Sure it can be done. Get two SANs that support replication, redundant
high-speed WAN links, high end servers, large UPSs, and generators.
It is just extremely expensive. :)
--
Adam Tauno Williams, Network & Systems Administrator
Consultant - http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com
Developer - http://www.opengroupware.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-05-30 22:26:57 | Re: High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-30 21:55:15 | Re: Fwd: Out of Memory on Reindex |