Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL.

From: Adam Tauno Williams <adamtaunowilliams(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL.
Date: 2007-05-30 22:12:02
Message-ID: 1180563122.4265.2.camel@aleph.whitemice.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 17:18 -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:42:08PM -0300, Fernando Ike de Oliveira wrote:
> > was 99,7% but considering the current necessities, change percentual
> > to 99,99%. I think in solution probability  pgpool-2 or Heartbeat +
> > GFS. The PostgreSQL servers will be in different physical places. 
> I would be very interested to see a set-up that can actually
> guarantee 99.99% uptime across a wide area link. 

Sure it can be done.  Get two SANs that support replication, redundant
high-speed WAN links, high end servers, large UPSs, and generators.

It is just extremely expensive. :)
-- 
Adam Tauno Williams, Network & Systems Administrator
Consultant - http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com
Developer - http://www.opengroupware.org


In response to

Responses

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2007-05-30 22:26:57
Subject: Re: High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL.
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-05-30 21:55:15
Subject: Re: Fwd: Out of Memory on Reindex

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group