Re: Normalized Ranking example incorrect in text search

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Normalized Ranking example incorrect in text search
Date: 2007-11-14 19:37:22
Message-ID: 11802.1195069042@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/textsearch-controls.html
> Ranking Search Results
> shows and example which says
> "This is the same example using normalized ranking"
> and then gives a query which calculates normalization in an incorrect
> manner,

On what basis do you claim that's an incorrect manner? It's exactly
what is described in the paragraph just before the examples.

> A correct example
> would be something like this:

> SELECT title, ts_rank_cd(textsearch, query, 8 /*Normalization*/) AS rank

Why is that correct (or more correct than other ways)?

> - Can we say what the differences are between the two ranking functions?
> Why do we have two?

We already say that: the _cd function doesn't work without positional
info in the input tsvector.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-14 19:49:26 Re: Normalized Ranking example incorrect in text search
Previous Message Jon Sime 2007-11-14 17:29:27 Re: Avoiding upgrade backlash