Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Autovacuum and XID wraparound

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Autovacuum and XID wraparound
Date: 2007-05-14 04:34:29
Message-ID: 1179117269.6047.3.camel@goldbach (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-patches
On Sun, 2007-13-05 at 22:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> This fact is already documented in at least three places; do we really
> need two more?

I think we need to at least modify the documentation for the autovacuum
GUC parameter, which currently states only that it "controls whether the
server should run the autovacuum launcher daemon" -- this is not
strictly true, and in any case, it isn't the whole story.

> The proposed addition to postgresql.conf seems particularly
> over-the-top

I agree that this information doesn't really belong in postgresql.conf.

-Neil



In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-05-14 04:38:21
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] OS/X startup scripts
Previous:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2007-05-14 03:31:40
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] OS/X startup scripts

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-05-14 04:38:21
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] OS/X startup scripts
Previous:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2007-05-14 04:29:14
Subject: Re: Updateable cursors patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group