On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 00:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The first design that comes to mind is that at transaction end
> (pgstat_report_tabstat() time) we send a stats message only if at least
> X milliseconds have elapsed since we last sent one, where X is
> PGSTAT_STAT_INTERVAL or closely related to it. We also make sure to
> flush stats out before process exit.
Sounds like a good general, long term solution.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner||Date: 2007-04-29 11:36:00|
|Subject: Re: Feature freeze progress report|
|Previous:||From: Martijn van Oosterhout||Date: 2007-04-29 10:25:17|
|Subject: Re: question for serial types with CHECK conditions|