Re: RESET command seems pretty disjointed now

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Florian Pflug <fgp(dot)phlo(dot)org(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RESET command seems pretty disjointed now
Date: 2007-04-26 16:16:35
Message-ID: 1177604195.6440.35.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 18:04 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> Attached patch addresses all 3 comments. As it will be
> top-level command, I put code into commands/discard.c

Applied with some minor tweaks -- thanks for the patch. I didn't bother
moving the regression tests out of guc.sql, although they don't really
belong there any longer.

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2007-04-26 17:29:47 Re: ECPG failure on BF member Vaquita (Windows Vista)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-04-26 16:15:15 Re: RESET command seems pretty disjointed now