Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Curious buildfarm failures

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Curious buildfarm failures
Date: 2013-01-15 02:39:38
Message-ID: 11767.1358217578@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
> The problem seems to be when the the old and the key hash to the same 
> bucket. In that case, hash_update_hash_key() tries to link the entry to 
> itself. The attached patch fixes it for me.

Doh!  I had a feeling that that needed a special case, but didn't think
hard enough.  Thanks.

I think the patch could do with more than no comment, but will fix
that and apply.

			regards, tom lane


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Abhijit Menon-SenDate: 2013-01-15 03:12:28
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v4
Previous:From: Vlad ArkhipovDate: 2013-01-15 02:38:11
Subject: Re: Get current query in a trigger function

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group