Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation
Date: 2007-11-11 04:48:59
Message-ID: 11765.1194756539@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> BTW, why are neither contrib/dblink nor contrib/spi included in the
>> conversion?

> I see dblink:
> http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/dblink.html

Oh, in that case the question is why the contrib/db/doc/ files are
still there.

> I assume spi wasn't done because it is just examples of SPI usage.

The .example files are fine, but what about the two README files?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-11 05:14:59 Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-11 04:42:10 Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation