Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken
Date: 2008-04-01 18:06:09
Message-ID: 11762.1207073169@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> In the meantime, does anyone have more information about how this came about?

Marc's always done both the tagging and the tarball-making, so you'd
have to ask him about that.  I believe he's made it more scripted over
the years, so this might reflect a manual foulup that (hopefully) is no
longer possible.

+1 for adjusting the tags in CVS to match what we actually shipped.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Aidan Van DykDate: 2008-04-01 18:20:39
Subject: Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken
Previous:From: Aidan Van DykDate: 2008-04-01 16:53:56
Subject: Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group