> It's important to get the *right* interface into the first release
> that has it.
Agreed, that's why I proposed the right interface to begin with :-)
> The day before feature freeze is way too late for
> blue-sky design IMHO.
Ok, I can certainly bring this up again in the next release cycle. And
I can include my own private implementation in any client applications
until we have something similar in libpq.
> I note that the nominal schedule
> says that all major proposals should have been made and reviewed at
> least a month ago.
Consider me spanked... (and quit giggling Bruce).
Korry Douglas korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2007-03-31 22:36:01|
|Subject: Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout|
|Previous:||From: Luke Lonergan||Date: 2007-03-31 19:33:45|
|Subject: Re: Oracle indemnifies PostgreSQL on its patents|