Re: Patch queue concern

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch queue concern
Date: 2007-03-29 10:03:14
Message-ID: 1175162595.4386.532.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 01:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > My feeling is we should have more regular sync points where the patch
> > queue is emptied and everything committed or rejected.
>
> No doubt, but the real problem here is that reviewing/committing other
> people's patches is not fun, it's just work :-(.

Gosh, you always seemed to enjoy my patches so much ;-)

We can all see how hard you and Bruce work and its very much
appreciated, even if we don't often say so. That's why everybody else
works so hard too. Sometimes we only communicate the tensions caused by
external expectations.

> So it's no surprise
> that it tends to get put off. Not sure what to do about that.

Well, one thing I can do is say Thanks now and try to do that more
regularly in the future.

The enjoyment you and others take from working on PostgreSQL is
infectious, so whatever else we do its gotta stay fun.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-03-29 10:07:12 Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD 2007-03-29 09:06:14 Re: Patch queue concern