Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: "Kenneth Marshall" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs
Date: 2007-03-28 14:55:46
Message-ID: 1175093747.4386.332.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 15:51 +0200, Florian G. Pflug wrote:

> BTW, the "COMMIT NOWAIT" feature Simon Riggs proposed should provide
> a huge speedup too, since dspam runs one transaction for each token
> it has to update.

I've switched to doing the COMMIT NOWAIT as a priority now, but do plan
to do both for 8.3.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-03-28 14:56:28 ECPG threads test
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-28 14:51:43 Re: Reduction in WAL for UPDATEs