| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL |
| Date: | 2010-02-11 18:08:24 |
| Message-ID: | 11741.1265911704@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> -1. it isn't necessary for PITR. It's a new requirement for
> standby_mode='on', unless we add the file size check into the backend. I
> think we should add the file size check to the backend instead and save
> admins the headache.
I think the file size check needs to be in the backend purely on safety
grounds. Whether we make pg_standby useful for this context is a
different discussion.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-02-11 18:11:01 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL |
| Previous Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2010-02-11 17:31:54 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-02-11 18:11:01 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL |
| Previous Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2010-02-11 17:31:54 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-02-11 18:11:01 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL |
| Previous Message | Karl Denninger | 2010-02-11 17:38:42 | Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Bug on pg_lesslog |