From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Dead Space Map version 2 |
Date: | 2007-02-27 07:49:01 |
Message-ID: | 1172562542.3760.525.camel@silverbirch.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 12:05 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> I think it's better to get DSM and HOT together. DSM is good at
> complex updated cases but not at heavily updated cases. HOT has
> opposite aspects, as far as I can see. I think they can cover each
> other.
Very much agreed.
I'll be attempting to watch for any conflicting low-level assumptions as
we progress towards deadline.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2007-02-27 08:08:39 | Re: [PATCHES] Load distributed checkpoint |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-02-27 07:07:22 | Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2007-02-27 08:08:39 | Re: [PATCHES] Load distributed checkpoint |
Previous Message | Chris Marcellino | 2007-02-27 07:29:10 | Re: POSIX shared memory support |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-02-27 08:11:37 | Re: Dead Space Map version 2 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-27 05:55:21 | Re: Dead Space Map version 2 |