| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_regress --temp-keep |
| Date: | 2004-10-15 18:11:11 |
| Message-ID: | 11721.1097863871@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at> writes:
> Bruce Momjian schrieb:
>> Uh, why would someone use this option?
> after fixing a minor issue, not to wait for a full
> de-install / install and test database loss.
> minor issues can be regression tests updates, or updated single binaries.
Personally I find that "make installcheck" is the better way to handle
such scenarios. This assumes of course that you have a playpen
installation you're working with, but it's hard to imagine doing
development without one.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-10-15 18:53:11 | Re: plperl Safe restrictions |
| Previous Message | Marek Lewczuk | 2004-10-15 17:52:50 | Re: postgresql 8.0 with cygwin - success |