Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-18

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-18
Date: 2009-06-19 17:45:36
Message-ID: 11718.1245433536@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> I like this report.  If people want it to be on Slaves, then fine.  But 
> it's a useful reminder.

Well, -slaves is where I was thinking it should go.  I guess the
question is whether any of the people it's actually meant for
are not reading -slaves.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2009-06-21 19:11:39
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16
Previous:From: Guido BarosioDate: 2009-06-19 17:26:40
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-18

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group