Re: Freezing is not WAL-logged

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Freezing is not WAL-logged
Date: 2006-10-19 19:14:48
Message-ID: 1171.1161285288@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

"Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I just noticed that freezing a tuple (in vacuumlazy.c) is not
> WAL-logged.

The theory is that this doesn't matter because the tuple is committed
either way ... it's equivalent to a hint-bit update which we don't
WAL-log either.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-10-19 19:22:04 Re: Freezing is not WAL-logged
Previous Message Cristian Ionescu 2006-10-19 07:34:30 hello