Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: bug in index?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Martin, Sylvain R(dot) (LNG)" <Sylvain(dot)Martin(at)lexis-nexis(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug in index?
Date: 2000-07-07 19:37:14
Message-ID: 11705.962998634@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
I had your prior message on my "to look at" list; the behavior seems
pretty odd.  Two questions:

  1.  Which version are you running, exactly?

  2.  Might 'peripherals & access' happen to be the largest (last in
      sort order) keyword present in your table?

If #2 is true, then this might represent some sort of boundary-condition
misbehavior in the cost estimator.  But I don't see anything like it
happening in current sources.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

  • bug in index? at 2000-07-07 18:56:07 from Martin, Sylvain R. (LNG)

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: ryanDate: 2000-07-07 21:30:03
Subject: "New" bug?? Serious - crashes backend.
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-07-07 19:13:05
Subject: Re: ps_status.h on FreeBSD 4.0 problems and fix

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group