Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot
Date: 2010-02-27 03:18:25
Message-ID: 11697.1267240705@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I don't see this as every having been applied.  What should we do with
> it?

I believe we decided that there wasn't any measurable win.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-02-27 03:23:19
Subject: Re: ECPG, two varchars with same name on same line
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-02-27 03:15:21
Subject: Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group