Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Florian Weimer" <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,<pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Date: 2007-01-04 17:05:04
Message-ID: 1167930304.20749.186.camel@silverbirch.site (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 17:58 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Simon Riggs:
> 
> >> Surely not.  Otherwise even the "on" setting is not really a defense.
> >
> > Only when the CRC is exactly zero, which happens very very rarely.
> 
> Have you tried switching to Adler32 instead of CRC32?

No. Please explain further.

-- 
  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-04 17:07:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Previous:From: Florian WeimerDate: 2007-01-04 16:58:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-04 17:07:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Previous:From: Florian WeimerDate: 2007-01-04 16:58:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group