On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 19:56 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I will start processing the patches held for 8.3 this week or next, now
> > > that the holiday break is over:
> > >
> > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
> > >
> > Some of these look obsolete. Also,
> > . the plperl out params patch needs substantial rework by its author, IMHO.
> > . there is a new version of the enums patch that has been submitted.
> Yes, I will have to go through it, find the valuable ones, and get
I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list
and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists?
There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show
up on either list. I haven't made a list of these, but they include
major patches such as Grouped Item indexes and a number of others. Many
of those are clearly marked as ready to apply/review/reject.
Can I request that those be reviewed first? The unapplied patches list
looks long and many things on it aren't even patches, AFAICS -
presumably TODO items-in-waiting?
Some minor points:
[PATCHES] Incrementally Updated Backup, Simon Riggs
has already been applied to 8.2
[PATCHES] WAL logging freezing, Heikki Linnakangas
has already been agreed/applied to 8.2
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 2007-01-04 12:25:38|
|Subject: Re: Request for review: tsearch2 patch|
|Previous:||From: Markus Schiltknecht||Date: 2007-01-04 09:00:32|
|Subject: Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question|