Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TODO: GNU TLS

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Date: 2006-12-31 15:58:23
Message-ID: 1167580703.22494.1.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> It seems your interpretation of the OpenSSL "position" is as
> questionable as your interpretation of the GPL, and what the GPL can
> legally require. :-)
> 
> Nobody has proven an issue exists. The only way to prove it would be
> for an actual court case to set the precident.

Further, OpenSSL is not saying that an issue exists for them. They are
saying that *some* people *may* have a problem with it.

Can we all talk about things that matter now? Like improving table
partitioning?

At a minimum, please move this thread to -advocacy. 

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



> 
> Cheers,
> mark
> 
-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Markus SchiltknechtDate: 2006-12-31 16:09:01
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Previous:From: markDate: 2006-12-31 15:42:42
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group